You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TheOtherDave comments on How can we get more and better LW contrarians? - Less Wrong Discussion

58 Post author: Wei_Dai 18 April 2012 10:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (328)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TheOtherDave 19 April 2012 09:06:11PM 2 points [-]

Conversely, the impetus to make the basic concept possible might increase if someone made a compelling case for what value it would provide.

Incidentally, I'm not suggesting that people should upvote/downvote based on "interesting" rather than "true".

I'm suggesting people should upvote/downvote based on "want more like this."

That means if I see a true comment, and I want to see more true comments, I upvote it because it's true.
If I see a well-written comment, and I want to see more well-written comments, I upvote it because it's well-written.
If I see a rhyming comment, and I want to see more rhyming comments, I upvote it because it rhymes.
Etc.

Being able to tag a vote to indicate what attribute(s) I wanted more or less of would admittedly be clearer in ambiguous cases... I do sometimes find myself staring at a downvote wondering what the reason for it was.

That said, I'm not sure it would actually add much value.