You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

JoshuaZ comments on Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality discussion thread, part 16, chapter 85 - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: FAWS 18 April 2012 02:30AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (1106)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 18 April 2012 03:40:47AM *  1 point [-]

Relevant link which FYI was the first thing I got when googling for "Dust Specks vs Torture".

Edit: Actually the second link listed is more direct.

Comment author: Alsadius 18 April 2012 12:22:10PM -2 points [-]

Ah, a chance to use a simple heuristic - if I see 3^^^3 in a philosophical question, terminate thought and respond with profanity. It's the simplest accurate algorithm for responding to such questions, I've found.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 19 April 2012 06:02:29AM 5 points [-]

Hi, I'm Omega. You have a choice between one person being tortured or 3^^^3 people getting dustspecks in their eyes. Also, if you respond with profanity, an additional 5^^^^^^5 +1 people will be tortured, and two puppies and a kitten will be drowned, and Busy Beaver(3^^^3) fruit flies will have their wings torn off.

Comment author: wedrifid 18 April 2012 12:46:14PM *  4 points [-]

Ah, a chance to use a simple heuristic - if I see 3^^^3 in a philosophical question, terminate thought and respond with profanity. It's the simplest accurate algorithm for responding to such questions, I've found.

Please don't do that (in a way that is in any way visible on this forum). If you can't keep your inability handle extreme cases to yourself then please leave.

Comment author: Alsadius 18 April 2012 09:02:04PM *  3 points [-]

I think half my problems on this forum stem from an inability to keep a bad joke to myself.