You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RobertLumley comments on A question about Eliezer - Less Wrong Discussion

33 Post author: perpetualpeace1 19 April 2012 05:27PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (158)
Tags: eliezer predictions

Comments (158)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: RobertLumley 19 April 2012 09:49:45PM *  0 points [-]

I guess I just don't trust that most gatekeeper simulators would actually make such an effort. But obviously they did, since they let him out.

Comment author: loup-vaillant 23 April 2012 02:11:05PM 2 points [-]

Maybe not. According to the official protocol, The Gatekeeper is allowed to drop out of character:

The Gatekeeper party may resist the AI party's arguments by any means chosen - logic, illogic, simple refusal to be convinced, even dropping out of character - as long as the Gatekeeper party does not actually stop talking to the AI party before the minimum time expires.

Comment author: Strange7 21 March 2013 06:01:45PM 0 points [-]

I suspect that the earlier iterations of the game, before EY stopped being willing to play, involved Gatekeepers who did not fully exploit that option.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit