You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ahartell comments on Stupid Questions Open Thread Round 2 - Less Wrong Discussion

15 Post author: OpenThreadGuy 20 April 2012 07:38PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (208)
Tags: stupid questions open thread open_thread stupid_questions

Comments (208)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: ahartell 21 April 2012 01:48:11AM 3 points [-]

What are the basic assumptions of ultilarianism and how are they justified? I was talking about ethics with a friend and after a bunch of questions like "Why is utilitarianism good?" and "Why is it good for people to be happy?" I pretty quickly started to sound like an idiot.

Comment author: orthonormal 21 April 2012 02:57:57AM 4 points [-]

I like this (long) informal explanation, written by Yvain.

Comment author: Alicorn 21 April 2012 02:17:33AM 1 point [-]

See also.

Comment author: Larks 21 April 2012 08:19:59AM 0 points [-]
  • Each possible world-state has a value
  • The value of a world-state is determined by the amount of value for the individuals in it
  • The function that determines the value of a world state is monotonic in its arguments (we often, but not always, require linearity as well)
  • The function that determines the value of a world state does not depend on the order of its arguments (a world where you are happy and I am sad is the same as one where I am happy and you are sad)
  • The rightness of actions is determined wholey by the value of their (expected) consequences.

and then either

  • An action is right iff no other action has better (expected) consequences

or

  • An action is right in proportion to to the goodness of its consequences
Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit