You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

orthonormal comments on Learn a foreign language to reduce bias? - Less Wrong Discussion

10 Post author: AShepard 22 April 2012 03:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (37)

Comments (37)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: orthonormal 22 April 2012 04:21:10PM 15 points [-]

Anything that activates System 2 (for instance, writing questions in a difficult-to-read font) has the same effect.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 22 April 2012 10:29:51PM 4 points [-]

Sounds interesting; got a citation?

Comment author: Lightwave 23 April 2012 09:58:19AM *  4 points [-]

Here's a quote from Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow:

The experimenters recruited 40 Princeton students to take the CRT (Cognitive Reflection Test). Half of them saw the puzzles in a small font in washed-out gray print. The puzzles were legible, but the font induced cognitive strain. The results tell a clear story: 90% of the students who saw the CRT in normal font made at least one mistake in the test, but the proportion dropped to 35% when the font was barely legible. You read this correctly: performance was better with the bad font. Cognitive strain, whatever its source, mobilizes System 2, which is more likely to reject the intuitive answer suggested by System 1.

Comment author: private_messaging 27 June 2012 05:06:35PM *  -1 points [-]

Is there really a 'system 1' and 'system 2' anyway? Brain is a real-time system, and has to provide gradual de-rating when the time is shorter. When facing a really complicated problem that would take a lot of time to solve, there's "system 2" type reasoning being not even wrong if not given enough time.

Comment author: orthonormal 28 June 2012 07:38:39PM 3 points [-]

"System 1" and "System 2" aren't meant to represent separate sub-minds; they're just a helpful categorization of mental processes. If you want a fuller disclaimer on this useful oversimplification, Kahneman has an excellent one in Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit