You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

ryjm comments on Muehlhauser-Wang Dialogue - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: lukeprog 22 April 2012 10:40PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (284)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Multiheaded 23 April 2012 08:03:12AM *  2 points [-]

He needs to taboo "adapive", read and understand Bostroms AI-behaviour stuff, and comprehend the Superpowerful-Optimizer view, and then explain exactly why it is that an AI cannot have a fixed goal architecture.

If AI's can't have a fixed goal architecture, Wang needs to show that AI's with unpredictable goals are somehow safe, or start speaking out against AI.

Damn right! These were my first thoughts as well. I know next to nothing about AI, but seriously, this is ordinary logic.