You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanielLC comments on Timeless Physics Question - Less Wrong Discussion

-5 Post author: DanielLC 28 April 2012 08:33PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanielLC 01 May 2012 06:12:43PM -1 points [-]

The basic events are "a particle moves from one place to another place" and "a particle is emitted or absorbed", and the amplitude or these events is "e" to the power of "i" times the "action" for this event

Is that like the idea that a particle being in a certain position has an amplitude? It doesn't. The universe does. It's just that if you pretended that a decohered particle was its own universe, you'd get the same results from much simpler calculations.

This does explain why physicists tend to write amplitude as a complex number. I've wondered that for a while.