You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

army1987 comments on Why do people ____? - Less Wrong Discussion

25 Post author: magfrump 04 May 2012 04:20AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (255)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 07 May 2012 02:23:25PM *  2 points [-]

it's too bad, because [...] It's a pre-commitment, limiting your options

Pre-commitment is only necessarily bad in for perfectly rational agents in one-player games without akrasia. In multi-player games (the ones where CDT doesn't work, e.g. Parfit's Hitchhiker), or if you have akrasia (which can be described as you acting as a different player than yourself at a different time), pre-commitment does win in certain situations. That's the whole point of picoeconomics, including pre-commitment devices such as Beeminder.

Plus, alcohol is not such a strong pre-commitment, anyway; it makes you less shy, but if you're really motivated not to do/say something, then alcohol won't make you do/say that.[1] If anything, it's a pre-commitment to not perform activities needing good reaction times and coordination such as driving.