You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

momothefiddler comments on Delayed Gratification vs. a Time-Dependent Utility Function - Less Wrong Discussion

2 Post author: momothefiddler 06 May 2012 12:32AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: momothefiddler 06 May 2012 02:48:20AM 1 point [-]

And if I'm "best at" creating dissonance, hindering scientific research, or some other negatively-valued thing? If I should do the thing at which I'm most effective, regardless of how it fits my utility function...

I don't know where that's going. I don't feel that's a positive thing, but that's inherent in the proposition that it doesn't fit my utility function.

I guess I'm trying to say that "wasting my life" has a negative value with a lower absolute value than "persuading humanity to destroy itself" - though oratory is definitely not my best skill, so it's not a perfect example.

Comment author: vi21maobk9vp 06 May 2012 04:53:27AM 0 points [-]

"Best at" may be considered to mean "creating most value for the given amount of effort"