You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Nisan comments on The ethics of breaking belief - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: thelittledoctor 08 May 2012 08:34PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (125)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Nisan 08 May 2012 09:46:13PM 0 points [-]

thelittledoctor is making no small claim here, but such sequences of levers do exist and have dispelled several people's faith.

Comment author: shminux 08 May 2012 10:22:44PM 2 points [-]

Does your link to the Sequences imply that you consider them all Dark Arts?

Comment author: MinibearRex 09 May 2012 12:48:20AM 4 points [-]

I don't personally think the Sequences count as Dark Arts, since I don't think EY was trying to employ them. At the same time, they were written by someone who very definitely assumed the social role of the wise and informed guru, who used humor, and all sorts of excellent rhetorical principles to make his points as persuasive as possible. If someone were to deliberately use those techniques in order to persuade someone of something because rational reasons wouldn't work, then I would call it Dark Arts.