You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Tetronian comments on Jason Silva on AI safety - Less Wrong Discussion

-2 Post author: curiousepic 09 May 2012 06:07PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (24)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 May 2012 06:56:06PM 6 points [-]

I would prefer to see fewer of these "Here's someone saying something vaguely relevant to transhumanism/FAI"-type posts. I don't mind when it's a well-known thinker whose opinion is actually worth updating on, or if the person in question can reach an extremely large audience, but I don't think someone like Jason Silva is worth a discussion post.

Comment author: shminux 09 May 2012 07:20:02PM 4 points [-]

You missed OP's point, which is crowdsourcing:

Anyone have the connections to change his mind and help the X-risk meme piggyback on his voice?

Comment author: [deleted] 09 May 2012 07:48:56PM 3 points [-]

Sorry, my phrasing wasn't very clear. I understood OP's intent; I just don't want to see outreach posts about lesser-known people.

Comment author: David_Gerard 10 May 2012 07:14:17AM -1 points [-]

Using them for practice might be useful and instructive.

Comment author: curiousepic 09 May 2012 07:17:09PM *  2 points [-]

It's my hope that Jason can update on our ideas, and he certainly does seem to have the potential to reach a large, if not extremely large audience. And it's my intuition that he will be more inclined to update while he is gaining popularity, than after he reaches it.

In my mind, this falls into rationality and X-risk outreach, and lies squarely within Discussion territory.

Comment author: [deleted] 09 May 2012 07:47:17PM 1 point [-]

I suspect we have differing expectations about how well-known Silva will become. This isn't a precise prediction, but I believe with ~65% confidence that he is at roughly the peak of his popularity (measured in terms of how frequently his name appears in blogs and major news outlets).

Personally, I would prefer to see fewer posts on x-risk outreach, especially those focused on contacting specific people, and especially when said person isn't very well-known.

Comment author: curiousepic 09 May 2012 08:08:18PM *  1 point [-]

I agree resources are well spent reaching out to those with a larger audience. But I would assert that it would take less resources to influence those with a smaller current audience; that the larger one's audience, the more one's current opinions are mentally reinforced.

And, he seems a prime target to be invited to the Singularity Summit, where he'd have hopefully influential social contact with SI folks.

Can I ask why you prefer to see fewer posts on outreach?

Comment author: faul_sname 10 May 2012 02:22:41AM 0 points [-]

That estimate sounds, if anything, a bit low. However, if there is a significant chance he will become very popular in the future, it may still be worthwhile to introduce him those topics now.