You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

thomblake comments on If epistemic and instrumental rationality strongly conflict - Less Wrong Discussion

5 [deleted] 10 May 2012 01:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (53)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: thomblake 11 May 2012 06:54:36PM *  0 points [-]

I don't think this is a fair analogy.

I wasn't making an analogy exactly. Rather, that example was used to point out that there appears to be some route to believing any proposition that isn't blatant gibberish. And I think Eliezer is the sort of person who could find a way to self-hack in that way if he wanted to; that more or less used to be his 'thing'.

Wouldn't a real animal that's not even much like a panda be called something else?

Exactly - "red pandas" were clearly made up for Avatar: the Last Airbender.

Comment author: Alicorn 11 May 2012 06:57:48PM 2 points [-]

No, in AtLA they're called "fire ferrets".