You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

steven0461 comments on Overview article on FAI in a popular science magazine (Hebrew) - Less Wrong Discussion

16 Post author: JoshuaFox 15 May 2012 11:09AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (33)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: steven0461 14 May 2012 08:30:25PM 1 point [-]

I'd be more likely to agree if there were somewhere else to productively discuss Singularity/FAI issues.

Comment author: thomblake 14 May 2012 08:35:05PM 0 points [-]

I agree that there should be somewhere else to discuss those things.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 15 May 2012 08:13:42AM 1 point [-]
Comment author: thomblake 15 May 2012 01:55:20PM 1 point [-]

Does that still exist?

Comment author: RichardKennaway 15 May 2012 02:22:15PM 0 points [-]

The site's there, but I don't know how active the community still is.

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 15 May 2012 07:36:36PM 3 points [-]

Dead.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 17 May 2012 09:22:36AM 3 points [-]

If that community couldn't sustain itself, is there reason to think a subreddit here would prosper any better?

The problem with discussion of AGI, nanotechnology, and all the other "Shock Level N" memes for N ≥ 2 is that there is no real subject matter. For the most part it's just verbal geekery about cool ideas that no-one is actually doing anything about, because they're too far beyond current capabilities. Fine to engage in for a while at an SF con or in a pub with other geeks, but there's only so long you can be at a party before realising you're just seeing the same ideas over and over and it's time to leave.

I never read SL4 -- is that an accurate description of why it died?

Comment author: Kaj_Sotala 17 May 2012 12:16:42PM 3 points [-]

I've entertained a similar hypothesis myself.

As for its relation to SL4, I'd say that it sounds roughly right - I wouldn't go as far as to say that there was "no real subject matter", but it's true that the list eventually ran out of worthwhile things to say that hadn't been already discussed.

Comment author: thomblake 15 May 2012 04:59:04PM 1 point [-]

Aha - a relevant discussion was had on the list about a year ago, hereabouts.

We really ought to have a subreddit if people really want to talk about sl4/fai topics here. A different site on the same engine would be even better.

Comment author: Zetetic 15 May 2012 10:48:07PM 0 points [-]

I'm 100% for this. If there were such a site I would probably permanently relocate there.