You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

RomeoStevens comments on I Stand by the Sequences - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: Grognor 15 May 2012 10:21AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (248)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: RomeoStevens 15 May 2012 11:12:37AM -1 points [-]

Any belief that I can be argued into by a blog post I can also probably be argued out of by a blog post.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 15 May 2012 11:35:30AM 7 points [-]

That sounds like you're saying that what beliefs you can be argued into is uncorrelated with what's true. I don't think you mean that.

Comment author: JoshuaZ 15 May 2012 03:02:50PM 2 points [-]

That doesn't necessarily follow from RomeoSteven's remark. It may take more subtle or careful arguing to persuade someone into a belief that is false. So in practice, what beliefs one can be argued into will be correlated with being true.

Comment author: Normal_Anomaly 15 May 2012 03:13:08PM 2 points [-]

Oh, so you think RomeoSteven was allowing for varying argument skill in the blog posts in question. That makes sense. Anything I can be argued into by a blog post, I can be argued out of by a blog post, if Omega takes up contrarian blogging. :)