You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

rhollerith_dot_com comments on A thought about Internet procrastination - Less Wrong Discussion

21 Post author: RolfAndreassen 15 May 2012 09:46PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (30)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 16 May 2012 06:09:24AM *  2 points [-]

What is the feature that makes it so deadly? I suggest that it is the random reinforcement schedule: Every five minutes you "press the lever", that is, check forum X or site Y. And every six or seven checks you get the reward: Someone posted something interesting!

What I want to know is whether a random reinforcement schedule becomes more addictive when we add the possibility that pressing the lever will lead to something aversive (e.g., a particularly stupid comment or one in which someone expresses enthusiasm for a course of action I think will cause more harm that good). I kind of suspect that such a schedule is better at hooking me than a random reinforcement schedule without the possibility of aversive outcome.

ADDED. For example, I note that reading internet forums open to all comers like LW causes aversive reactions in me much more frequently than does reading professionally authored and edited publications, e.g., The Atlantic or Smithsonian magazine, and I note that I get more hooked on the former than on the latter.

Comment author: khafra 16 May 2012 12:35:42PM 2 points [-]

I can't locate the study right now, but a gamble did, indeed, become more attractive when the researchers added a losing option.

Comment author: rhollerith_dot_com 16 May 2012 06:50:39PM 0 points [-]

When you say "more attractive", do you mean more attractive to people who have not gambled yet or more habit-forming?