= 27d567bc2d48d9f40e9ccc20ea370b15)
HoverHell comments on A thought about Internet procrastination - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
= 783df68a0f980790206b9ea87794c5b6)
Loading…= b715d02e85f7b3b4ae65ca3d3e450868)
Subscribe to RSS Feed
Powered by Reddit
= f037147d6e6c911a85753b9abdedda8d)
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (30)
It will probably take you few months to a year of constant internet browsing (probably will have to do it read-only) to get to the point where you don't find most of the stuff interesting and, thus, stop getting “rewards” from that. (Although, I suspect, having some misanthropy helps with that, even if generally not recommended).
Also, a reminder: willpower is a stream-limited (and capped too) resource.
I am not sure my "rewards" are decreasing in a long term. First, I learn where to find the more interesting stuff (my filters improve). Second, more interesting stuff is created (the internet expands). For example recently my "rewards" were pretty low and I felt like I will stop procrastinating online... and then I found LW.
I agree with the "read-only" mode, because being a part of community gives its own "rewards". This is how I reduced my addiction to the website I spent a lot of time previously -- I have noticed that I spend more time writing than reading (and that my estimates of the writing time are even worse than my estimates of reading time), so I decided to stop writing. After a few weaks, reading felt much less interesting.
It's possible (not guaranteed, though) that “waterline” for minimal quality of things that you find interesting (rewarding) will rise (note that LW/sequences is relatively high quality already, though wouldn't yet try to define “quality” here), up to the point when approximately all (with more and more rare exceptions) things on the internet can be seen as boring-because-unoriginal (i.e. they start to become repetitive if seen sufficiently generally).
The idea is based on a very small (<4) and very selective sample, of course, and general extrapolation wouldn't be very helpful (though if you don't find sufficiently interesting some simple reading of fixed set of newssites with no search for additional materials — “morning newspaper”-like, that's already some suggesting indicator).
The “community participation” is a case where such rewards-decrease is almost guaranteed to not happen (though it's also a stable need anyway).