You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

DanArmak comments on Imposing FAI - Less Wrong Discussion

3 Post author: asparisi 17 May 2012 09:24PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (8)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: DanArmak 19 May 2012 02:47:18PM 1 point [-]

I also expect a big first-mover advantage. Assuming that, you aren't answering the question of the post. Which is: if someone invents FAI theory but not AGI theory, how can they best make or convince the eventual first-mover on AGI to use that FAI theory? (Suppose the inclusion of the FAI theory has some negative side effects for the AGI builder, like longer development time or requiring more processing power because the FAI theory presupposes a certain architecture.)