You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Desrtopa comments on [POLL RESULTS] LessWrong Members and their Local Communities - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: maia 21 May 2012 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (18)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Desrtopa 22 May 2012 04:53:29PM *  4 points [-]

There are alternatives to a human killer which would provide some opportunity to make headway, which do not have priors that are obviously lower than a human with a supernatural weapon, such as extraterrestrials or some sort of supernatural creature which is humanly beatable.

The first point where I got really pissed off though was when L jumps all the way to "the killer must know the victim's real name" based on the murder of Lind L. Tailor. Lind L. Tailor was a convicted criminal, and L. wasn't, and killing criminals was already Kira's suspected modus operandi. It was not just possible, but probable, that Kira wouldn't react to a non-criminal's threat to apprehend him (it could have been against protocol, against his/her/it's moral code, unnecessary because Kira is completely unassailable, rejected as unnecessary because Kira is confident enough to think he/she/it is unassailable, etc,) even if doing so was entirely within Kira's abilities. And even if we take for granted that Kira would want to kill L, and assume that Kira has magic action-at-a-distance murder powers, but not magic action-at-a-distance information gathering powers, then whether the victim's name is known or not is just one variable that's flipped between L and Lind L. Tailor. L could just as well have been impervious because he eats too many sweets.

Comment author: Ritalin 29 October 2012 05:29:13PM 0 points [-]

... Good rational answers always seem obvious in retrospect, don't they...