You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Will_Newsome comments on The rational rationalist's guide to rationally using "rational" in rational post titles - Less Wrong Discussion

64 Post author: Vaniver 27 May 2012 07:13PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Will_Newsome 29 May 2012 03:46:32AM 0 points [-]

Don't single quotes normally indicate paraphrasing?

Comment author: TimS 29 May 2012 01:37:41PM 2 points [-]

Gwern is apparently familiar with more quoting styles than I, because no style I'm familiar with allows quote marks of any kind for something that isn't a direct quote.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 29 May 2012 09:25:13AM 2 points [-]

Don't single quotes normally indicate paraphrasing?

No. Quotes, single or double, normally indicate quotation, or a few other things such as the use-mention distinction, but never paraphrasing.

Comment author: gwern 29 May 2012 12:59:03PM 1 point [-]

Under some quoting styles, yes, they do. But no quoting style is so prevalent that this alone decides the question.

Comment author: Nornagest 29 May 2012 09:37:03AM 1 point [-]

I was taught that single quotes are nested inside double quotes and vice versa, the default being double, but that they're otherwise equivalent.

Comment author: [deleted] 29 May 2012 06:59:07PM *  0 points [-]

Maybe you're thinking of scare quotes or glosses, but they're normally restricted to single words or short phrases.