Well, we need lots of help besides elite young math/compsci talent. You could contact louie.helm [at] singinst.org and explain your experience and qualifications. Thanks for your interest!
Is it really optimal to dismiss Incorrect as not being elite math/computer science talent so quickly?
Also, are you familiar with growth versus static models of intelligence? This looks to me like you are promoting a static model, which amounts to destroying a public good in my view.
University professors don't tell students they are too stupid to contribute to the problems they are trying to solve. I don't see why SI should either.
Series: How to Purchase AI Risk Reduction
Here is yet another way to purchase AI risk reduction...
Much of the work needed for Friendly AI and improved algorithmic decision theories requires researchers to invent new math. That's why the Singularity Institute's recruiting efforts have been aimed a talent in math and computer science. Specifically, we're looking for young talent in math and compsci, because young talent is (1) more open to considering radical ideas like AI risk, (2) not yet entrenched in careers and status games, and (3) better at inventing new math (due to cognitive decline with age).
So how can the Singularity Institute reach out to young math/compsci talent? Perhaps surprisingly, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality is one of the best tools we have for this. It is read by a surprisingly large proportion of people in math and CS departments. Here are some other projects we have in the works:
Here are some things we could be doing if we had sufficient funding: