You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jacob_cannell comments on Building toward a Friendly AI team - Less Wrong Discussion

24 Post author: lukeprog 06 June 2012 06:57PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (95)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jacob_cannell 13 June 2012 04:47:14PM *  0 points [-]

In the world I live in, results in one field that are actually important in other fields have a funny way of becoming known.

In the world I live in, inventors use and read about math, without the services of some personal conduit to the higher math gods.

Who determines whats important? The actual inventors, period.

The historical example shows that inventors don't have this problem. Perhaps you believe otherwise, that invention has proceeded sub-optimally to date and would have been faster if only mathematicians and their ideas had more status. I don't see evidence for this.

Actually I see evidence that our society tends to overrate the historical contributions of mathematicians to technical inventions.

Also, like I said in the other thread, it depends what one means by math.

LW-folk in particular (and perhaps lukeprog in extra particular), appear to have an especially strange mathematician fetish.