You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Oligopsony comments on [Link] Thick and thin - Less Wrong Discussion

23 [deleted] 06 June 2012 12:08PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (12)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: Oligopsony 06 June 2012 02:45:56PM *  4 points [-]

Suppose we call a Type A Error attempting to attack a thick problem with thin methods, and a Type B Error attempting to attack a thin problem with thick methods. Not all problems are inherently thick or thin, but plausibly the discipline of economics might be a massive A-error, while continental philosophy might plausibly be a massive B-error.

What are some non-obvious heuristics for reducing errors of these sorts? (I can think of some obvious ones, but my guess is that they're so thoroughly internalized that the nonobvious heuristics will end up correcting for them as often as not.)

Comment author: Emile 06 June 2012 03:38:38PM 3 points [-]

Suppose we call a Type A Error attempting to attack a thick problem with thin methods

As illustrated here.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 06 June 2012 04:41:50PM 0 points [-]

And, for that matter, here; indeed, it's one of XKCD's recurring themes.

Comment author: Emile 06 June 2012 03:36:48PM *  1 point [-]