You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Emile comments on [Link] SMBC on choosing your simulations carefully - Less Wrong Discussion

8 Post author: RolfAndreassen 06 June 2012 05:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (14)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Emile 07 June 2012 01:48:37PM 1 point [-]

The error is in considering the simulation chip a reason to not care about death.

In the comic, the woman is arguing that the chip is a reason to not care about death as a way to disarm a threat. Modifying your preferences for game theoretic reasons can be a very sensible thing to do.

Comment author: wedrifid 07 June 2012 10:44:10PM 1 point [-]

In the comic, the woman is arguing that the chip is a reason to not care about death as a way to disarm a threat. Modifying your preferences for game theoretic reasons can be a very sensible thing to do.

It can be. It wasn't this time. It resulted in her death.

Comment author: RolfAndreassen 07 June 2012 04:15:37PM 1 point [-]

Fair enough, but the point seems to be that the woman didn't modify her preferences sufficiently, or didn't fully think through the modifications - in effect, she was bluffing, even if perhaps she didn't realise it.