You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

TimS comments on Intellectual insularity and productivity - Less Wrong Discussion

53 [deleted] 11 June 2012 03:10PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (169)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: TimS 11 June 2012 08:59:46PM 1 point [-]

The fact that the sequence you are referring to is known as the "Quantum Mechanics" sequence is evidence of the failure of that sequence to achieve its goal.

Comment author: David_Gerard 12 June 2012 05:18:19PM 1 point [-]

is known as the "Quantum Mechanics" sequence

It was called that by its author, wasn't it?

Comment author: TimS 12 June 2012 07:06:30PM *  2 points [-]

If I write a book with the primary goal of teaching calculus, then spend 2/3 of the book arguing that Leibniz invented calculus before Newton, I'm likely to fail at teaching calculus.

If I title the book, "Leibniz was Right," I'm just compounding the error, right?