<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
<channel>
<title>
[SEQ RERUN] Optimization and the Singularity - Less Wrong Discussion
</title> <link>http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/</link>
<description></description>
<item>
<title>[SEQ RERUN] Optimization and the Singularity</title>
<link>http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2012 13:01:32 +1000</pubDate>
<description>
Submitted by &lt;a href="http://lesswrong.com/user/MinibearRex"&gt;MinibearRex&lt;/a&gt;
&amp;bull;
3 votes
&amp;bull;
&lt;a href="http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/#comments"&gt;1 comment&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;Today's post, &lt;a href=&quot;/lw/rk/optimization_and_the_singularity/&quot;&gt;Optimization and the Singularity&lt;/a&gt; was originally published on 23 June 2008. A summary (taken from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Less_Wrong/2008_Articles/Summaries#Optimization_and_the_Singularity&quot;&gt;LW wiki&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;#xA0;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;An introduction to optimization processes and why Yudkowsky thinks that a singularity would be far more powerful than calculations based on human progress would suggest.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;br&gt;Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was &lt;a href=&quot;/lw/czm/seq_rerun_surface_analogies_and_deep_causes/&quot;&gt;Surface Analogies and Deep Causes&lt;/a&gt;, and you can use the &lt;a href=&quot;/r/discussion/tag/sequence_reruns/&quot;&gt;sequence_reruns tag&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;/r/discussion/tag/sequence_reruns/.rss&quot;&gt;rss feed&lt;/a&gt; to follow the rest of the series.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go &lt;a href=&quot;/r/discussion/lw/5as/introduction_to_the_sequence_reruns/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;a href="http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/#comments"&gt;1 comment&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>oliverbeatson on [SEQ RERUN] Optimization and the Singularity</title>
<link>http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/6x3s</link>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://lesswrong.com/r/discussion/lw/d0j/seq_rerun_optimization_and_the_singularity/6x3s</guid>
<dc:date>2012-06-28T19:52:26.075819+10:00</dc:date>
<description>
&lt;div class=&quot;md&quot;&gt;&lt;p&gt;Just me, or is this like the most convincing article on this subject?
Certainly it has the best verbal illustration of the theory. Very neat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
</description>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>