(I suspect that if SI found the right way to communicate their core message, they could persuade average people that AI research is dangerous pretty easily without any technical jargon or reference to science fiction concepts.)
I have no doubt of this. It's not difficult to convince average people that a given technological innovation is dangerous. Whether doing so would cause more good than harm is a different question.
It looks as though lukeprog has finished his series on how to purchase AI risk reduction. But the ideas lukeprog shares are not the only available strategies. Can Less Wrong come up with more?
A summary of recommendations from Exploring the Idea Space Efficiently:
If you're strictly a lurker, you can send your best ideas to lukeprog anonymously using his feedback box. Or send them to me anonymously using my feedback box so I can post them here and get all your karma.
Thread Usage
Please reply here if you wish to comment on the idea of this thread.
You're encouraged to discuss the ideas of others in addition to coming up with your own ideas.
If you split your ideas into individual comments, they can be voted on individually and you will probably increase your karma haul.