You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

GLaDOS comments on [Link] Why don't people like markets? - Less Wrong Discussion

9 Post author: GLaDOS 20 June 2012 10:15AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (67)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: GLaDOS 21 June 2012 08:15:00AM 4 points [-]

Ok sure I can agree with this, even if I think Overcoming Bias/LessWrong used to be more interesting when we stuck to EY's proposed norm. But come now you must know of what I'm talking about when I say:

It has now been applied to everything from biology, sociology, sexuality and even recently to religion.

There has been overreach. Worse politics as the mindkiller is now being used as a political tool.

Comment author: Nornagest 21 June 2012 08:49:36AM *  1 point [-]

Yeah. There are a number of meta-level concerns here that complicate the problem, but at the object level the difficulty is that our present attitude towards politics creates an unstable equilibrium: there are politically charged topics that can and should be discussed with the LW toolkit, but there's a pretty strong tendency to go beyond those tools and into unproductive sparring, and no good way to stop it.

I'm for the mind-killer meme insofar as it provides a way to put on the brakes before discussion gets to that point. But I don't think it's actually very good at that, especially since there's the potential for it to be used as a bludgeon against political viewpoints individual posters don't agree with (those they do, of course, register as common sense rather than ideology). Banning politics altogether is one way to deal with this, hence the norm creep; and it really does need to be dealt with. But I'd like to see a better approach.