You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

army1987 comments on What Would You Like To Read? A Quick Poll - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: alyssavance 21 June 2012 12:38AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (43)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 21 June 2012 03:17:28PM 2 points [-]

Like what? FYI, PDF hasn't been proprietary since 2008, and there are plenty of free/open source implementations of it.

Comment author: shokwave 21 June 2012 07:56:02PM 4 points [-]

The structure of the specification is gigantic, lengthy, and wrong-headed on many points. It's a file format but it tries to define details of how it should be viewed (!!!). It is bloated and inefficient. It moves things away from becoming efficient data - plain text becomes formatted or even a flat picture of words.

Comment author: thomblake 22 June 2012 02:51:20PM 0 points [-]

As an illustration of how messed up the spec is, even Adobe Photoshop commonly fails to render PDFs the same way as Adobe Acrobat.