You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

asr comments on Malthusian copying: mass death of unhappy life-loving uploads - Less Wrong Discussion

12 Post author: Stuart_Armstrong 02 July 2012 04:37PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: [deleted] 06 July 2012 08:27:23AM 1 point [-]

" Apple has now done it twice,"

No they didn't. At least one of those times was actually the software I described above, bought from the company I worked for. So I know exactly how hard it was to create.

"Things like the JVM or the Microsoft common language runtime are basically emulators for an abstract virtual machine" -- which the engineers themselves get to specify, design and implement,

"Further, I suspect the human brain is less sensitive than software to minor details of underlying platform. " I would love to live in a world where re-implementing an algorithm that runs on meat, so it runs on silicon instead, amounted to a 'minor detail of underlying platform'. I live i this one, however.

Comment author: asr 06 July 2012 01:59:55PM 2 points [-]

re-implementing an algorithm that runs on meat, so it runs on silicon instead, amounted to a 'minor detail of underlying platform'. I live i this one, however.

I had assumed we were talking about low-level emulation: the program explicitly models each neuron, and probably at a lower level than that. And physical simulation is a well understood problem and my impression is that the chemists are pretty good at it.

Trying to do some clever white-box reimplementation of the algorithm I agree is probably intractable or worse. The emulation will be very far from the optimal implementation of the mind-program in question.