You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Andreas_Giger comments on Can anyone explain to me why CDT two-boxes? - Less Wrong Discussion

-12 Post author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 06:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (136)
Tags: cdt newcomb

Comments (136)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 08:35:44AM 0 points [-]

What are you referring to? I'd like to avoid confusion if possible.

Comment author: jsalvatier 02 July 2012 08:41:35AM *  3 points [-]

I think people are finding phrases "CDT is solving a separate problem" and "CDT refuses to play this game and plays a different one" jarring. See my other response. Edit: people might also find your tone adversarial in a way that's off-putting.

Comment author: wedrifid 02 July 2012 09:02:29AM *  7 points [-]

I think people are finding phrases "CDT is solving a separate problem" and "CDT refuses to play this game and plays a different one" jarring. See my other response. Edit: people might also find your tone adversarial in a way that's off-putting.

Jarring, wrong and adversarial. Not a good combination.

Comment author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 08:51:57AM 0 points [-]

Yes, I saw your other reply, thank you for that.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit