You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jsalvatier comments on Can anyone explain to me why CDT two-boxes? - Less Wrong Discussion

-12 Post author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 06:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (136)
Tags: cdt newcomb

Comments (136)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: jsalvatier 02 July 2012 08:41:35AM *  3 points [-]

I think people are finding phrases "CDT is solving a separate problem" and "CDT refuses to play this game and plays a different one" jarring. See my other response. Edit: people might also find your tone adversarial in a way that's off-putting.

Comment author: wedrifid 02 July 2012 09:02:29AM *  7 points [-]

I think people are finding phrases "CDT is solving a separate problem" and "CDT refuses to play this game and plays a different one" jarring. See my other response. Edit: people might also find your tone adversarial in a way that's off-putting.

Jarring, wrong and adversarial. Not a good combination.

Comment author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 08:51:57AM 0 points [-]

Yes, I saw your other reply, thank you for that.

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit