You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

philh comments on Can anyone explain to me why CDT two-boxes? - Less Wrong Discussion

-12 Post author: Andreas_Giger 02 July 2012 06:06AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (136)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: wedrifid 02 July 2012 03:49:40PM 5 points [-]

I meant it assigned a probability p>0 to violation of causality being possible.

It intrinsically says nothing about causality violation. All zero is not a probability and lack of infinite certainty issues are independent of the decision theory. The decision theory just works with whatever your map contains.