You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

NancyLebovitz comments on Irrationality Game II - Less Wrong Discussion

13 [deleted] 03 July 2012 06:50PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Article Navigation

Comments (380)
Tags: irrationality contrarianism fun disagreement

Comments (380)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 04 July 2012 04:19:44PM 2 points [-]

What I meant was that there may be more to such things as auras, ghosts, precognition, free will, etc. than current skepticism allows for, while still not having anything in the universe other than matter/energy.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 05 July 2012 06:22:04AM -1 points [-]

Taboo "matter/energy".

Comment author: wedrifid 05 July 2012 06:40:31AM 5 points [-]

Taboo "matter/energy".

Well damn. What is left? "You know... like... the stuff that there is."

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 05 July 2012 10:02:26AM 2 points [-]

Thank you. I was about to ask the same thing.

Comment author: Eugine_Nier 06 July 2012 03:17:51AM -1 points [-]

My point is that what counts as matter/energy may very well not be obvious in different theories.

Comment author: Armok_GoB 10 July 2012 01:43:45AM 1 point [-]

Algebra.

Comment author: Eliezer_Yudkowsky 09 July 2012 06:30:09PM 1 point [-]

Causes and effects.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 July 2012 09:13:48PM 1 point [-]

Causes and effects.

Good point. But this 'cause' word is still a little nebulous and seems to confuse some people. Taboo 'cause'!

Powered by Reddit Powered by Reddit