My bad for perpetually erring on the side of brevity.

By "good sense" I mean it's fundamentally wise to account for how people might react to what you're saying when you're figuring out how to say it. That can go either way. For example, if your audience has evaporatively cooled to the point that they'll only tolerate virulently anti-PC or PC views, then you probably won't have much incentive to "reach across the aisle," as it were.

EDIT: This is irrespective of the facts, of course. The anti-PC crowd may have greater access to the facts by virtue of their comfort with prickly ideas, but of what use is that advantage if the people who need those same facts most refuse to listen? It's a truism, I know, but operative aspect of that word here is true.