You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

jimrandomh comments on Transparency in Insurance (Edit: Solution found) - Less Wrong Discussion

4 [deleted] 06 July 2012 06:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jimrandomh 06 July 2012 07:42:34PM 11 points [-]

The insurance companies are playing a form of iterated prisoner's dilemma against each other. If one company made itself highly transparent, it would gain business at the expense of all the opaque companies; but the opaque companies would follow suit, leading to a new equilibrium in which the industry as a whole made less money, but apportioned in the same way. Additionally, disclosing the contents of their price-setting black boxes would make it easier for new companies to construct similar boxes, and become competition.

Comment author: shminux 06 July 2012 07:55:32PM 8 points [-]

If one company made itself highly transparent, it would gain business at the expense of all the opaque companies

This is a standard way for a (new) wireless carrier to try to set itself apart from the incumbent confusopolies. Of course, once entrenched, they stop defecting.