Less Wrong is a community blog devoted to refining the art of human rationality. Please visit our About page for more information.

jimrandomh comments on Transparency in Insurance (Edit: Solution found) - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: jaibot 06 July 2012 06:01PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (36)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: jimrandomh 06 July 2012 07:42:34PM 11 points [-]

The insurance companies are playing a form of iterated prisoner's dilemma against each other. If one company made itself highly transparent, it would gain business at the expense of all the opaque companies; but the opaque companies would follow suit, leading to a new equilibrium in which the industry as a whole made less money, but apportioned in the same way. Additionally, disclosing the contents of their price-setting black boxes would make it easier for new companies to construct similar boxes, and become competition.

Comment author: shminux 06 July 2012 07:55:32PM 8 points [-]

If one company made itself highly transparent, it would gain business at the expense of all the opaque companies

This is a standard way for a (new) wireless carrier to try to set itself apart from the incumbent confusopolies. Of course, once entrenched, they stop defecting.