You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Wix comments on Moderate alcohol consumption inversely correlated with all-cause mortality - Less Wrong Discussion

0 Post author: michaelcurzi 11 July 2012 05:41PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (78)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: [deleted] 11 July 2012 08:50:36PM 13 points [-]

A post-doc at my lab told me that the non-drinker group include sober alcoholics, something that might cause the non-drinker group to have a higher overall mortality.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 11 July 2012 11:06:35PM 8 points [-]

A mention of a study which excluded sober alcoholics, and hypothesizes that a little alcohol is good because it makes socializing more likely.

Comment author: [deleted] 12 July 2012 12:00:08AM 2 points [-]

Good read, aside from reliving social anxieties, there is also the self-medicating aspect; since alcohol dulls anxieties in general some people claim that it actually has a net positive effect on public mental health, highly speculative, but worth considering.

Comment author: Prismattic 12 July 2012 12:25:20AM 2 points [-]

Another possible confounding factor is that the amount people drink is correlated to some genetic differences, which might have other health consequences.

I don't drink at all due, among other things, to the fact that alcohol tastes so awful to me that I cannot help involuntarily grimacing after taking a sip of wine, beer, or liquor.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 July 2012 02:20:35AM 0 points [-]

I generally don't like alcohol, though my tolerance has gradually increased (to way below average) over time.

Does distaste for alcohol correlate with anything else?

Comment author: Alicorn 12 July 2012 05:15:25AM *  1 point [-]

Does distaste for alcohol correlate with anything else?

Supertasting. I strongly suspect I am one. There are only two things on the list of seven things supertasters often don't like which I'll consume (Brassica oleracea cultivars and soy) and I hate the other things.

Comment author: NancyLebovitz 12 July 2012 09:06:43AM 1 point [-]

I think of myself as a sub-supertaster. No to grapefruit and coffee (unless the coffee flavor is very mild as in ice cream). Yes to kale. No to alcohol, except in small quantities. Green tea is more tolerable than black. I seem to like olives less than a lot of people, but the problem is with bitterness more than saltiness. I don't seem to like salt as much as a lot of people do. I like hot peppers a lot.

In general, my tolerance for bitter flavors has increased with time.

Comment author: dekelron 13 July 2012 11:49:17PM 0 points [-]

I wonder why it's called "super" if it's a bad thing...

Comment author: Alicorn 14 July 2012 01:47:46AM 2 points [-]

Who says it's bad? It means being more sensitive to taste; it just turns out that some things aren't very nice if you can really taste them. Other stuff tastes great!

Comment author: wedrifid 14 July 2012 12:48:33AM 2 points [-]

I wonder why it's called "super" if it's a bad thing...

Adverb: Especially; particularly.

Comment author: Viliam_Bur 12 July 2012 02:29:28PM 0 points [-]

Thanks for the link! I look at how it describes my tastes: I hate beer, coffee, grapefruits, tonic. I dislike uncooked cabbage, green tea, soda. I'm OK with cooked cabbage, soy; and I like chilli and olives.