You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

army1987 comments on HP:MOR and the Radio Fallacy - Less Wrong Discussion

22 Post author: RichardChappell 21 July 2012 07:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (57)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: shminux 24 July 2012 09:00:46PM -1 points [-]

You're not likely to find a remotely reasonable hypothesis, even in the Methodsverse where magic abounds, by which the internal parts of a thinking computation can be damaged by damaging the brain, and yet removing the whole brain leaves the soul capable of internal thinking.

Why not? Letting a brain decompose kills the "thinking computation", while cryonizing it supposedly does not.

Similarly, damaging a living brain may damage the attached soul, while death of a reasonably intact brain could be interpreted as a detachment of a reasonably intact soul.

Comment author: Incorrect 25 July 2012 01:45:44AM -1 points [-]

Taboo death

Comment author: wedrifid 25 July 2012 01:51:03AM 0 points [-]

Taboo death

A perfect taboo. In the literal non lesswrong sense.

Comment author: shminux 25 July 2012 03:01:31AM -1 points [-]

Sure. "Last breath".

Comment author: Incorrect 25 July 2012 03:33:51AM *  -1 points [-]

Are you supposing that oxygenating a human's blood without the use of lungs would result in the loss of their soul?

I think you will find that the only way to exclude such hypothetical possibilities is to define death as sufficient brain damage (although I suppose you could define it as cessation of neural activity if you don't mind the possibility of dead people coming back to life; that would still result in a very large proportion of souls being damaged)

Comment author: wedrifid 25 July 2012 03:39:40AM 2 points [-]

Are you supposing that oxygenating a human's blood without the use of lungs would result in the loss of their soul?

Sure, but they'll get it back (and lose 30 IQ points and a whole bunch of cool) if cursed by gypsies.

Comment author: shminux 25 July 2012 05:05:07AM -1 points [-]

We are not talking about anything real-world, remember. The original setting:

a remotely reasonable hypothesis, even in the Methodsverse where magic abounds