You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

philh comments on Group rationality diary, 7/23/12 - Less Wrong Discussion

4 Post author: cata 24 July 2012 08:49AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (48)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: philh 25 July 2012 03:26:27AM *  2 points [-]

I second wedrifid's recommendation for evil-mode. (I also use nonstandard bindings ;w ;b ;k for save, switch buffer, kill buffer respectively, and these are a lot faster than the equivalent ex-mode commands would be.) I also use auto-complete-mode just about everywhere; I don't have semantic completion (it's on my todo list), but it's very useful anyway. I like reading camelCase but not typing it, and often I can just type camelca<tab> to get camelCase. ido-mode is also a massive win.

On a lower level, binding F5 to compile has been a great improvement for me over my old "move mouse to terminal window, press up-enter" workflow. More recently I got further improvements by rebinding F5 in haxe mode to "find the makefile-equivalent higher in the directory tree, then compile" instead of using "M-x cd" in every buffer.

I haven't found org-mode as useful as others report. I like its structure, and I've written presentations in it; but my emacs start up buffer is an org-mode todo list that I haven't updated in over a year. This may be a more general problem with myself and todo lists. (I have found that writing them on paper is helpful.)