You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Cyan comments on Is Politics the Mindkiller? An Inconclusive Test - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: OrphanWilde 27 July 2012 05:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (276)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Cyan 27 July 2012 07:27:58PM *  3 points [-]

It's good to note the obvious oversight in the grandparent's claim. That said, a charitable reading of that claim (operationalized for your convenience) is that there does not exist a prediction rule that takes a fairly detailed description of a being's* behavior in some task requiring intelligence and outputs a high accuracy classification.

*selected from a known mutually exclusive and exhaustive list of possibilities limited to human infants and adult intelligent mammals.

Comment author: RichardKennaway 28 July 2012 06:33:40PM *  0 points [-]

there does not exist a prediction rule that takes a fairly detailed description of a being's* behavior in some task requiring intelligence and outputs a high accuracy classification.

To look for one presumes, as does Dallas, that the division between entities with rights and entities without is to be drawn in terms of current mental capability. Someone in dreamless sleep currently has less mental capability than an awake baby, or, I guess, a soon-to-be-born one. The argument for turning off Terri Schiavo's life support was that she had no possibility of regaining any mental function, not that she currently had none.

Comment author: Cyan 29 July 2012 02:35:42AM *  0 points [-]

Why are you replying to me instead of Dallas? I'm not defending the argument. I just noticed that more than one person was distracted by the obvious oversight, so I zombified Dallas's claim as best as I was able.