You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Lightwave comments on Is Politics the Mindkiller? An Inconclusive Test - Less Wrong Discussion

14 Post author: OrphanWilde 27 July 2012 05:45PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (276)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Lightwave 29 July 2012 08:48:03AM 0 points [-]

There's some semantic confusion going on here with the word 'define'. By 'define your values' I meant something like 'state your values explicitly'.

Clippy's pattern matching algorithm itself defines (or constructs, if you prefer) a category that can be explicitly stated. It seems natural to say that Clippy values according to its paperclip category.

Comment author: buybuydandavis 30 July 2012 02:48:18AM 0 points [-]

a category that can be explicitly stated.

In actual fact, there's little reason to believe that anyone in the universe can explicitly state Clippy's values accurately.

I believe that with sufficient study and analysis, someone could. But positing that Clippy exists in no way entails that anyone can.