You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

fubarobfusco comments on [Retracted] Simpson's paradox strikes again: there is no great stagnation? - Less Wrong Discussion

30 Post author: CarlShulman 30 July 2012 05:55PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (51)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: fubarobfusco 30 July 2012 08:00:49PM *  0 points [-]

Simpson's paradox is a simple mathematical explanation for the error, "political correctness" is a complex socially-constructed one intimately tied up with particular political positions. Occam's Razor favors the former, overwhelmingly so.

There is no need to introduce the hypothesis that the error is due to people not agreeing with the particular political views of the Blue Party (which is what the "political correctness" hypothesis states), when simple math suffices to explain it.

Comment author: James_Miller 30 July 2012 11:06:15PM *  2 points [-]

There is no need to introduce the hypothesis that the error is due to people not agreeing with the particular political views of the Blue Party (which is what the "political correctness" hypothesis states), when simple math suffices to explain it.

If the Blue Party has the belief that it's evil to ever think that any non-white racial group is on average worse at anything than white people are and if this belief is one of the most important beliefs of the Blue Party then what there is no need to introduce here is Simpson's paradox.

Steve Landsburg (like myself) is a college professor. The President of his university recently attacked Landsburg on politically correctness grounds. Landsburg's post was an implicit attack on blank slate politically correctness.