You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Roommate interest and coordination thread

9 Post author: patrickscottshields 02 August 2012 09:22AM

This thread is for the discussion of options for people interested in changing their living environments some time in the next year or so. It's a place to:

  • Share your situation to get an outside view
  • Get on the radar of potential roommates
  • Discuss existing communities or places that may be a good fit
  • Describe what you're looking for in a living environment
  • Post your procedure for deciding where to live
  • Coordinate with others to find compatible roommates
  • Discuss which factors are relevant to deciding where to live
  • Post resources or data relevant to deciding where to live

Whether you're graduating from college, moving for a new job, or looking to further optimize your living environment for other reasons, talking with others can help you identify options, catch inaccurate beliefs or poor reasoning, meet potential roommates, and more. Thanks to everyone who contributes!

(This thread has been on my mind for a while. Reading this recent roommate-seeking post inspired me actually write and post it. I'll post my own situation in the comments below.)

To discuss the concept of this thread (rather than participating in the thread's intended discussion), please reply to this comment. Credit goes to the open transactions thread and group rationality diary for some of the style and wording of this post.

Comments (47)

Comment author: [deleted] 02 August 2012 09:48:42PM *  12 points [-]

-

Comment author: Kevin 04 August 2012 04:29:35AM 7 points [-]

Well, if you make it out to Berkeley, you're welcome to be the drummer in my hypothetical rationalist rock band. I've been procrastinating about putting it together for a long time, but we have enough talented instrumentalists and vocalists together to make a great band.

(I play drums too, but realistically actually prefer playing percussion to drum sets, and I always like rock bands with drums + aux percussion...)

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 05:21:56AM *  1 point [-]

Thanks! Originals? Covers? Can I crash on the couch in your mansion for months and months while we "work on music?"

Comment author: Kevin 04 August 2012 05:37:58AM 1 point [-]

Well, we (where we means I) don't really have any music written and lots of counterfactual disputes about whether we want to optimize for popular appeal or not. The kind of music that I would actually want to write if I was capable of writing it myself, is somewhere between Alcest and Zomby. I'm sure by virtue of collaboration it will end up sounding nothing like that.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 06:01:52AM 1 point [-]

We like very, very different things. But that isn't necessarily a problem! Anyway, I don't know what I'm doing or where I'm living, so it's moot.

Comment author: Alicorn 04 August 2012 06:58:05AM 0 points [-]

Alcest reminds me of Leaves' Eyes.

Comment author: Alicorn 04 August 2012 05:01:27AM *  1 point [-]

my hypothetical rationalist rock band

Who else would be in it?

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 05 August 2012 03:25:38AM *  4 points [-]

Try planning tomorrow out in advance every evening, and iteratively discover what works?

All my motivational breakthroughs came when I stopped trying to figure out what I "really wanted to do", ala Paul Graham's How to Do What You Love, and started setting and accomplishing goals because I wanted to goals accomplished for their own sake (as opposed to because I thought the act of working towards the goals themselves would be intrinsically fulfilling).

Comment author: jsalvatier 03 August 2012 06:18:34PM 4 points [-]

<hug>

Keep in mind that people are strongly affected by the people they hang out with.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 August 2012 08:37:34PM 2 points [-]

Thanks. Yeah, I'm keeping that in mind. I just feel like I'm a weird limbo because I don't fit with the artsy folks or the sciencey folks.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 02 August 2012 11:14:17PM 2 points [-]

Thanks for sharing. What's your plan? How much of your time do you think it would be optimal to spend assessing your options with regard to where to live?

I love the idea of living with "agent-y" rationalists, but I definitely don't love the idea of slowly discovering that I'm intractably not motivated or smart enough to truly "hang."

My impression is that the majority of aspiring rationalists are willing to work with each other through our flaws, rather than expecting perfection. I suspect the smartest, most popular people in the rationality community take up a disproportionate amount of our attention, which can make inadequacy feel more plausible than it really is. If we try, I don't think we'll have trouble finding awesome living environments.

Comment author: [deleted] 03 August 2012 08:18:06PM *  5 points [-]

Anytime! I'm happy to share my bewilderment. As of now I do not have a plan apart from waiting until inaction becomes so painful that I act out of sheer desperation. But, because this is LW, I suppose I'll try some empiricism.

I think it's reasonable to assume that I could combine distance teaching via Skype with in-person lessons for a minimum of 5 students/week at $40/lesson. It's also safe to assume that my current part-time bussing gig, which nets me about $700/month, is transferable. So that's a safe-ish bet of ~$1500/month to work with. What will my cost of living be?

The locations I’m considering are NYC, Berkeley, and Northampton, MA.

Monthly expenses, mostly irrespective of location:

  • Food: At least $40/week for groceries, plus another solid $30 for meals out. It’s likely I won’t spend that much, but I might as well plan for it. I've tried my entire adult life to restrict my restaurant habit. Doesn’t work unless it’s harder for me to physically get to restaurants than it is to go to grocery store and make food at home.

  • Cellphone: I don't really want one, but my friends will get annoyed if I go without. Let's say ~$50 for a minimal plan. I may be able to get this down further if I get on somebody's "family" plan.

  • Transportation: I prefer to bike or walk most places, but in NYC busyness and inclement weather often get in the way, so subtract at least another $50 (if I live elsewhere, this subtraction covers sundries).

  • Stuff: At least $100. The price of socializing, etc. In NYC this is a lowball figure. I’m guessing that’s true of the Bay as well.

  • Utilities: I’m honestly not sure. I’ll say $50 and let the stuff/sundries cushion cover any extra.

So that’s a rounded-up maximum of $550/month in non-rent expenses. What are expected rents?

  • NYC: $650 if I watch Craigslist like a hawk.

  • Berkeley: So far, the rationalist group homes I’ve read about have been throwing around figures of $700-800. I’d shoot for the low end.

  • Northampton: $550 will likely net me a place close to the center of town.

So I’m looking at monthly living expenses of $1200 in NYC, $1250 in Berkeley, and $1100 in Northampton. Which means I realistically only accrue savings if I live in Northampton or get a different job or more students. At the moment, Noho is the top contender, but let’s look at some other concerns.

Will I be able to practice and teach drums in my living space?

  • NYC: I probably have an “in” at my ex-band’s rehearsal space in WIlliamsburg. I’m pretty bad at operating in far mode, though -- historically, having to trek across town has killed my desire to practice. Teaching on a practice pad will probably be acceptable in a ground floor apartment, but basement access, etc, is less likely.

  • Berkeley: A houseful of rationalists would work with me to help me achieve my aims. And if we’re picking the house as a group, then my need for drumming/teaching space will be accounted for.

  • Northampton: A laid-back, artsy culture means that in-home drumming is probably ok, but passive-aggressive griping may follow. I can work around it.

Is daily life stressful? I don't thrive on stress, like, at all.

  • NYC: Legendarily. Noise, bad smells, zero solitude, a half hour train ride to grass and trees.

  • Berkeley: I’ve only visited -- many years ago -- but aside from scrambling to make ends meet, daily life seems pretty chill. Famous for forgiving weather.

  • Northampton: Unstressful to the point of stagnation. Lots of green space and quiet.

NYC is falling behind, leaving the contest to Berk and Noho. But that’s just the Stark Realities round. Dark horses can surprise you in the What The Fuck Am I Doing With My Life round. Coming soon!

Comment author: gwillen 04 August 2012 04:43:50PM 5 points [-]

So I’m looking at monthly living expenses of $1200 in NYC, $1250 in Berkeley, and $1100 in Northampton. Which means I realistically only accrue savings if I live in Northampton or get a different job or more students.

My experience with budgeting my life suggests that your margin of calculational error will swamp the given differences.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 05:07:53PM 3 points [-]

That may be true for NYC and Berkeley, but in the case of Northampton I'm already discovering that I'll have more money than I previously thought.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 04 August 2012 03:07:53AM 3 points [-]

I enjoyed reading your analysis. If there's anything in particular you want input on, I'd be happy to share my perspective.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 09:09:07PM *  0 points [-]

-

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 07:45:46PM *  0 points [-]

-

Comment author: David_Gerard 02 August 2012 11:18:57PM 3 points [-]

I did this because I wanted to build internal motivation.

I didn't understand this bit. What do you mean?

Comment author: [deleted] 03 August 2012 08:32:54PM *  6 points [-]

I was massively inspired by this essay, specifically:

The most fundamental freedom is the freedom to do nothing. But when you get this freedom, after many years of activities that were forced, nothing is all you want to do. You might start projects that seem like the kind of thing you're supposed to love doing, music or writing or art, and not finish because nobody is forcing you to finish and it's not really what you want to do. It could take months, if you're lucky, or more likely years, before you can build up the life inside you to an intensity where it can drive projects that you actually enjoy and finish, and then it will take more time before you build up enough skill that other people recognize your actions as valuable.

It sort of reminds me of how succession works in forests -- the operative part of concept being incredibly vast amounts of time.

Basically, I bought into a folk wisdom about motivation that is very, very difficult to falsify. One thing I've learned for sure: being alone most of the time may have been important in the beginning, but now it's only a liability.

Comment author: David_Gerard 03 August 2012 10:28:59PM 8 points [-]

Well, I can empathise. I spent 1993 sitting on my extremely nice front porch drinking coffee, smoking Lucky Strikes and reading all the newspapers with my burnt-out ex-Communist housemate, and achieving 0. It was the right thing at the right time. I think.

Comment author: [deleted] 04 August 2012 05:19:43AM 4 points [-]

How old were you? What brought you to the porch? What roused you from the porch?

Comment author: David_Gerard 04 August 2012 07:16:34AM 5 points [-]

26, had suffered recent horrible experience of working an actual day job, burnt out from doing an indie rock fanzine for several years. We didn't have Internet then so I had to actually go see my friends or them come visit me. I got a job at the end of that year and then moved from Perth (which is like said porch the size of a city) to Melbourne.

Comment author: jooyous 29 January 2013 06:03:30AM 1 point [-]

Dude, you know what? That used to work for me! Back when ... it worked for me. I don't think all akrasias are made of the same stuff because that definitely works for some types of them. I just think you don't know in advance which one and you only realize it's not working after a wasted few months.

Comment author: shminux 03 August 2012 10:43:30PM 1 point [-]

after many years of activities that were forced, nothing is all you want to do

Cool, now I have something to blame my post-PhD akrasia on.

Comment author: KnaveOfAllTrades 17 August 2013 08:57:01PM *  0 points [-]

My curiosity requests an update on outcome/progression of your considerations in this comment and its children. :)

Comment author: [deleted] 20 August 2013 11:49:08PM 0 points [-]

I still have my health, more or less? Ask me again in five years.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 02 August 2012 09:26:04AM *  6 points [-]

I attended the Center for Applied Rationality's June rationality camp in Berkeley, and would very much like to have a full-time living environment similar to the environment at camp. I'm very interested in joining or working to create a living environment that values open communication and epistemic hygiene, facilitates house-wide life-hacking experimentation, provides a collaborative, fulfilling environment to live and work in, and those sorts of things.

I'll finish my computer science degree in May, and I plan to make changes to my living situation at that time. I plan to apply a portion of my time over the next ten months to identifying and assessing potential living environments, and I am interested in collaborating with others throughout the process. Contact me if you think collaboration could be mutually beneficial (I would rather you err on the side of contacting me.)

I started a software development company last summer under which I have been developing a web application that assesses tasks' utility in order to suggest high-utility tasks to users. I have not publicly released the application, but I use it daily to manage my own tasks. Contingent on my startup remaining a high-utility prospect in my mind, I'd like to work on it full-time after I graduate. I am very interested in live-work arrangements (e.g. working and living on the same premises), or in living close to a coworking space or an affordable office space.

My finances are limited right now. That would change if I got a full-time software engineering job once I graduate, but I'd rather work for my startup and finance things through part-time or contract work if necessary (if you're interested in hiring me, please contact me.) I'm especially interested in collaborating with other programmers, working in Python or Go, working on data visualizations in D3, programming rationality exercises, or working on something that qualifies as "data science".

I live in Kansas, and it's alright here. I preferred the weather in Berkeley when I visited there last month. I think I would enjoy living in the San Francisco bay area, but the cost of living is high there. I'm interested in identifying affordable places to live that are competitive with the amenities of the bay area. I'm also very interested in meeting and networking with potential roommates.

In terms of resources, I have found Sperling's BestPlaces to have a lot of good information about U.S. cities.

Comment author: hamnox 03 August 2012 05:29:24PM 2 points [-]

I share your interest in a rationality and life-hacking house. I'd like to coordinate with you on that, if only to help see that it happens. I wonder how it might intersect with my friend's interest in creating a neighborhood of "Tiny Houses"--affordable and economic housing, that definitely forces you to be aware of all your stuffs' utility.

Also think programming of rationality exercises is a good idea. I've been ruminating on the idea of starting a less intensive but more long-term version of minicamp in my area, that I've in good humor dubbed "Nanocamp". Online practice exercises is one way to keep lessons consistent and progress trackable.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 04 August 2012 03:34:52AM *  1 point [-]

Taboo "coordinate".

What do you think are the best places to live?

Comment author: hamnox 06 August 2012 05:36:43PM 1 point [-]

Coordinate: Bounce ideas off each other through skype/email, draft roommate agreements, partially finance if I can, move in myself, plan and lead house projects, etc.

Like minicamp is still very different from minicamp when you're talking about going from four days together to all-year-round. Is this targeted towards young graduate-age? It's going to be a very different kettle of fish depending on whether college is involved, or kids.

The actual place seems less important to me than that I actually like and trust the people next to me. That's probably why I like the idea of the mini-camp house so much; I implicitly trusted everyone at mini-camp. This was partially because I pegged the group as coming from a demographic that was unlikely to screw people over a priori, partially because I trusted that most people there would have good reason and an admirable plan before trying something, and partially because I'd gotten all sentimental and couldn't help but identify the group as my tribe. But there wasn't enough time or pressure there to be proven right or wrong. We'd have to work hard and intentionally to keep an enriching, collaborative environment like that going long-term. The exact kind of intentionality I haven't seen put into keeping in touch after minicamp, by myself or anyone else. (That's harder to admit than I thought it would be, that I've been failing miserably in my plans to keep these connections open and that it counts as evidence against the feasibility of creating my own long-term community.)

As far as places go, my mind keeps being drawn back to my friend's efforts to create a tiny house neighborhood. It's highly available to me, and the criteria just seem to overlap so well. Affordable, good amenities, close to working places, intentional community... I'll get back to you about actual places once I finish my own research.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 07 August 2012 01:50:54AM 1 point [-]

Thanks for this detailed post!

I have assumed a certain level of compromise when considering living situations. For example, I have assumed that people would not be willing to move a specific city for the primary purpose of joining an awesome living environment, but would instead be willing only to optimize within preexisting geographical constraints.

If there were enough people willing to relocate somewhere for the primary purpose of establishing an awesome living environment, that opens up a new class of opportunities more appealing than the ones I've been considering. For example, if there were several people interested in working for their own startups, maybe they could lease a building together, or utilize collective purchasing to lower the costs of bookkeeping or legal services. (Is anyone interested in doing that?)

I think such an intentional living community would be significantly more difficult to create than finding a few compatible roommates in a particular city, but I'm willing to look into it further.

Comment author: EvelynM 14 August 2012 05:55:23PM 0 points [-]

Kansas is not as much as a disadvantage as it used to be, with Google Fiber at $70/month.

What are you trying to optimize for?

Comment author: patrickscottshields 14 August 2012 06:24:34PM *  0 points [-]

I feel like the first paragraph of my original explanation of my situation addressed this, so maybe I don't understand what you're asking. Can you either rephrase your question or give an example of the kind of response you're looking for?

Comment author: drethelin 04 August 2012 06:21:05AM 1 point [-]

Madison Wisconsin!

Comment author: XFrequentist 02 August 2012 03:41:44PM 3 points [-]

I am currently looking for an apartment in Montreal, and would love to live with lesswrongers/rationalists.

I have the impression that there are relatively few candidates in the city, but I'm happy to get into more detail about my characteristics/situation should one (or more) possible housemates exist!

Comment author: DaFranker 16 August 2012 06:38:27PM *  0 points [-]

I also have the impression that there are very few rationalists or LWers nearby. I've got a few hypotheses as to why that could be, but they don't really supply me with useful methods of doing anything about it in the short term with my limited resources.

Comment author: Kevin 02 August 2012 02:41:05PM 1 point [-]

Anyone want to live in a historic mansion in the sunny part of San Francisco? http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sfc/apa/3160458077.html

Comment author: patrickscottshields 02 August 2012 06:14:41PM *  0 points [-]

Are you looking to move in there?

Comment author: Kevin 03 August 2012 01:30:15AM 1 point [-]

I am, but it'll be impossible for me to pull off the logistics to do it unless a few wealthy people step up with the liquid money for security deposit.

Comment author: realitygrill 20 August 2012 03:14:49AM 1 point [-]

Looking for a temporary place in Cambridge starting in September. PM me!

Comment author: folkTheory 05 August 2012 06:40:09AM 1 point [-]

I'm moving to Seattle in September. If you're looking to move in that area, send me a PM or comment.

Comment author: Anomier 08 April 2013 07:32:59PM 0 points [-]

I live in the Bay Area, and am looking for a room.

I would like to improve my psychological environment.

Comment author: patrickscottshields 02 August 2012 09:36:08AM *  0 points [-]

Discuss the concept of this thread here. For example, how could it be more useful? What would you do differently?

Comment author: RobertLumley 02 August 2012 02:38:33PM 8 points [-]

I'm not sure it will be very useful without a sticky feature, which we really need for a number of threads. We have all sorts of threads like this that could be stickied and be very helpful, but I'm afraid that at some point, this will drift off the front page and never be seen again.

Comment author: John_Maxwell_IV 05 August 2012 03:48:33AM *  1 point [-]

How's this for a solution for "sticky threads":

  • Link to them somewhere prominent in the wiki, like the FAQ.
  • Whenever you post in a sticky thread, you're also supposed to post in the most recent open thread with a link to your post in the sticky thread. This acts as an advertisement for your post while also keeping all the sticky thread posts on a single webpage for easy viewing.
Comment author: RobertLumley 05 August 2012 02:09:37PM 1 point [-]

This already exists. The last time it was updated though was in May, by me, and the last time before that was... well. I guess you already knew about this. That was your edit...

The problem, I think, is that it takes too long to edit the wiki, so no one really wants to, and I don't feel particularly motivated to edit it when no one else is keeping up with the threads they're posting.

Comment author: dbaupp 02 August 2012 07:26:00PM 1 point [-]

For reference, issue 283 covers the sticky feature. It doesn't seem like much has happened, but matt's suggestions seem workable (and even almost optimal).