CarlShulman comments on [video] Robin Hanson: Uploads Economics 101 - Less Wrong Discussion
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.
Comments (54)
This doesn't make sense to me as an objection. Some tasks are not very short and parallelizable, so you need extended serial work. And some of those tasks will profit from coordination between different minds with different skills, or different memories from earlier in the project. Coordinating those units would require some kind of communication and management.
I'm sure it says more about my imagination than the nature of future work, but I still can't imagine anything one can meaningfully work on that can't be either parallelized, or treated like a computer program. It makes it hard to think about the subject without a concrete example to wrap my head around.
Take 50 researchers working on related topics to improve an algorithm to do object recognition in industrial robots. Each topic involves lemmas building upon lemmas, experiments selected based on previous experiments, and other serial steps. The steps are different for the different subtopics. As intermediate results come in, communication and management are used to allocate resources between subtopics, to determine which researchers spend how much time explaining their work to one another to cross-fertilize insights, and so forth.