You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

asr comments on [video] Robin Hanson: Uploads Economics 101 - Less Wrong Discussion

6 Post author: mapnoterritory 05 August 2012 09:00PM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (54)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: asr 06 August 2012 08:13:20PM *  4 points [-]

There again, there is tail risk. You may not be made whole if the pension custodian is bankrupted by fraud, seized by the government, or otherwise subject to accident.

There's an easy empirical way to assess this. Ask how common are violent political revolutions and what happens to financial products sold before the revolution. Did the All-Russia Insurance Company continue to pay out on policies after the 1917 Revolution? The headquarters building was seized by the Cheka and I believe the owners and executives were exiled or liquidated. What happened if you had your pension investments in Iran in 1979?

Yes, there are rich, developed, stable countries where revolution is rare. How long will they stay that way? A century? Two centuries? In the presence of Singularity-scale disruption? These stories about multiplying wealth by factors of thousands or more seem to be making a very heavy bet on permanent stability of the sort never previously seen on Earth.