You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

OrphanWilde comments on The Doubling Box - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: Mestroyer 06 August 2012 05:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 07 August 2012 02:33:35PM 2 points [-]

Am I correct in assessing that your solution is to stop when you can no longer comprehend the value in the box? That is, when an additional doubling has no subjective meaning to you? (Until that point, you're not in a state loop, as the value with each doubling provides an input you haven't encountered before.)

I was about to suggest stopping when you have more utilons than your brain has states (provided you could measure such), but then it occurred to me the solutions might be analogous, even if they arrive at different numbers.

Comment author: Mestroyer 07 August 2012 10:44:17PM 1 point [-]

I wouldn't want to stop when I couldn't comprehend what was in the box. I always want more utility, whether I can understand that I have it or not. My solution is to wait as long as you can before waiting any longer puts you in an infinite loop and guarantees you will never get any.

Comment author: OrphanWilde 08 August 2012 01:41:30PM 1 point [-]

As long as you comprehend the number in the box, you're not in an infinite loop. The input is different. Once the number is no longer meaningful, you're potentially in an infinite loop; the input is the same.

Comment author: Mestroyer 10 August 2012 01:29:26AM 0 points [-]

I'm pretty sure I could stay out of an infinite loop much longer than I could comprehend what was in the box. The contents of the box are growing exponentially with the number of days. If I just count the number of days, I can stay in the realm of small numbers much longer.