You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Giles comments on The Doubling Box - Less Wrong Discussion

13 Post author: Mestroyer 06 August 2012 05:50AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (82)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Giles 07 August 2012 04:58:34PM 1 point [-]

This seems like a helpful simplification of the problem. Note that it also works if you receive 1-1/N utilons, so as with the original post this isn't an unbounded utility issue as such.

Just one point though - in the original problem specification it's obvious what "choose an integer N" means: opening a physical box on day n corresponds to choosing 2^n. But how does your problem get embedded in reality? Do you need to write your chosen number down? Assuming there's no time limit to writing it down then this becomes very similar to the original problem except you're multiplying by 10 instead of 2 and the time interval is the time taken to write an extra digit instead of a day.

Comment author: wedrifid 09 August 2012 04:21:39PM 0 points [-]

But how does your problem get embedded in reality?

It doesn't. It gets embedded in something with infinite time and in which infinite utility can be given out (in infinite different denominations).

Comment author: prase 07 August 2012 08:16:26PM *  0 points [-]

... to write an extra digit ...

Writing decimal digits isn't the optimal way to write big numbers. (Of course this doesn't invalidate your point.)

Comment author: Oscar_Cunningham 09 August 2012 02:44:50PM 0 points [-]

It kind of is if you have to be able to write down any number.