You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Zaine comments on [Link] Admitting to Bias - Less Wrong Discussion

19 Post author: GLaDOS 10 August 2012 08:13AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (129)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Zaine 11 August 2012 03:33:21PM *  1 point [-]

Isn't the point of this site to espouse the process of thinking rationally? to support and encourage others in coming to their own conclusions about the where the map lies over the territory? Indeed, if rationality is reliable at all in improving one's accurate perspective of the world, much of the community will come to the same conclusions - and of course others will I'm sure appreciate the availability of some guiding logic that may assist in them in learning to think more rationally. However, shouldn't others be left to their process and not forced to accept a conclusion they have yet to reach themselves, lest they be deemed irrational?

It just seems like pointless signalling hypocritical to the principles of the site itself to thrust a bottom line out there and say, "This is rational and not agreeing to this is irrational - whatever gets you here, I don't care, but make sure you do!"

As a summary metaphor:
In maths, you can reach right answer using incorrect methods, yet it will be a singular feat.

Comment author: Emile 11 August 2012 04:09:00PM 2 points [-]

Sorry, did you accidentally reply to the wrong comment? (or is there some link I'm not seeing?)

Comment author: Zaine 13 August 2012 06:02:22PM 0 points [-]

My bad, I kept meaning to include a disclaimer notifying you that I wasn't so much responding to your comment as I was saying something that I thought needed saying after having read your comment.

This was the impetus:

... stupid positions that happen to be mostly held among conservatives, like religion.

Even though you qualified that statement as a meta example of a cheap shot while noting that cheap shots aren't to be tolerated, I still thought it needing saying.