In all fairness, teleology can be prompted by mathematical models. For example, the principle of least action (also known as the Fermat's principle in geometric optics) makes it look like a certain inanimate object has a purpose or even can predict the future: "light travels between two given points along the path of shortest time". Of course, if you dig deeper, the next-level model says that all paths happen, but only the one with the least action happens to survive their mutual interference, negating any teleological ideas.
Today's post, Three Fallacies of Teleology was originally published on 25 August 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).
This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Magical Categories, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.
Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.