Very definitely, its easy to forget the level of knowledge necessary t work at for this stuff. For example I recently realised that in a room of competitive debaters (college educated well read people) no-one knew what I meant by epistemic uncertainty. And very few philosophers know anything about QM or neurology...
TL;DR Illusion of transparency is a bitch.
very few philosophers know anything about QM or neurology
Very few philosophers need to know anything about QM or neurology.
I'm sure most of us are used to just being able to badger him about things in the comments here on LW, but for anyone interested here's the link.