You're looking at Less Wrong's discussion board. This includes all posts, including those that haven't been promoted to the front page yet. For more information, see About Less Wrong.

Kawoomba comments on [Link] Social interventions gone wrong - Less Wrong Discussion

24 [deleted] 20 August 2012 09:24AM

You are viewing a comment permalink. View the original post to see all comments and the full post content.

Comments (75)

You are viewing a single comment's thread. Show more comments above.

Comment author: Kawoomba 20 August 2012 03:17:58PM 5 points [-]

Agreed on RCTs being the gold standard, the top tier of the evidence hierarchy (other than reviews of multiple RCTs).

However, if you choose a biased (corrupted) indicator, all your perfect measurement methodology can only minimize additional biases. A top of the line flood-proof house that you erect on top of a swamp will still go down. (Substitute with weakest-link analogy of your choice.)